替换
查找内容:
替换为:
全部替换
插入链接
链接网址:
链接显示标题:
请选择网址类型
点我插入链接
插入文件
文件名称:
文件显示标题:
请选择文件类型
点我插入文件
发现错误 发表观点

原文内容

反馈意见

提交 正在提交..... 反馈历史

复制下面的地址分享给好友

确定 正在提交.....
train

你好,

关闭
提交 重做 重新开始 关闭
跳转
  • 新建同级
  • 新建子级
  • 删除
  • 重命名
选择收藏夹
新建收藏夹
公开

取消 确定

1. 基本信息
姓名:
企业:
职位:
联系方式:
邮箱:
2. 请在此填写您的问题,我们将优先安排答疑
提交

报名成功!
课程观看链接如下:
请添加课程助理微信,获得更多信息:
确认
确定
取消 确认

识林

  • 知识
  • 视频
  • 社区
  • 政策法规
    • 国内药监
    • FDA
    • EU
    • PIC/S
    • WHO
    • ICH
    • MHRA
    • PMDA
    • TGA
  • 研发注册
    • 概览
    • 监管动态
    • 研究专题
  • 生产质量
    • 概览
    • 监管动态
    • 各国GMP
    • 中国GMP
    • 中国GMP指南
    • GMP对比
    • 检查缺陷
    • 研究专题
  • 主题词库
  • 帮助中心
  • 关于识林
    • 识林介绍
    • 识林FAQs
    • 功能介绍
    • 团队诊断
    • 联系我们
  • 30天免登录

    忘记密码?

FDA发布仿制药研发受控函指南草案

首页 > 资讯 > FDA发布仿制药研发受控函指南草案

页面比对

出自识林

FDA发布仿制药研发受控函指南草案
GDUFA
页面比对
笔记

2014-08-28 Lachman CONSULTANTS

跳转到: 导航, 搜索

作为其GDUFA承诺的一部分,FDA发布了题为“仿制药研发相关的受控函行业指南”。FDA在这份文件中明确了受控函(Controlled Correspondence, CC)不包括公民请愿、请愿复审或停留请求。

该文件提供的细节和建议如下:

  • FDA对受控函满足FDA GDUFA承诺目的的考虑是什么;
  • 请求者的什么信息可以包含在受控函中以帮助FDA考虑并回复受控函;
  • FDA将在交流中提供什么信息给提交控制函的请求者。

尽管仿制药办公室(OGD)从未有对CC的官方定义,为满足GDUFA目标OGD定义CC如下:

由或代表仿制药生产商或相关企业提交给FDA的,请求仿制药产品研发具体要素信息的函件。

OGD进一步澄清了如果在CC中提出了一个问题,同时也在公民请愿中提出,那么只有在FDA回答了提出类似问题的具体请愿后才开始计算回复CC的目标日期。 还有一个“搁置”CC,这里FDA可能会考虑还没有做出决定的特殊复杂问题。根据指南草案,OGD将通知这类问题CC的提交并将在当时关闭此CC。 OGD指出,这类问题通常会导致指南的制定以解决这一问题。

OGD还定义了关于CC GDUFA目标日期的一些例外。过去建议要求生物等效性(BE),BE方案和会议请求都被要求作为控制函,但是将不再这样要求,因为对这些问题的回复可能需要来自于多学科或CDER其它办公室的相当多的投入。此外,还有审评BE指南的过程,一旦指南提议建立,这让OGD可以回应广大公众。回应个别请求将在项目中产生不必要的负担。还有审评会议请求和BE方案的项目,这一项目将继续在CC过程之外被遵循。

其它OGD在CC定义之外考虑的问题包括:

  • 关于ANDA状态的问题
  • 与药品开发无关的问询(例如,OGD行政实践问题,或尚未在美国获批的药品问题)
  • 不涉及具体产品研发的一般问题将不会被分配GDUFA目标日期。

一个重大的转变是,OGD已确定有资格在GDUFA目标下提交CC的单位类型,仅包括药品生产商和相关企业。FDA称:“由其他各方(例如,公民个人、金融机构,或不直接参与仿制药产品开发的公众团体)提交的与仿制药相关的问询,应直接提交到CDER的药品信息处。”

指南中指出CC应提交以电子形式提交到GenericDrugs@fda.hhs.gov,电子邮件必须从企业邮箱地址发送,因为OGD不会考虑来自于一般或个人帐户的CC作为属于GDUFA目标的CC,并且将不会处理此类邮件。

指南中提供了关于CC内容的信息。FDA指出外国企业必须有一个美国代理或代表,他们必须有一个安全的电子邮件地址,以便FDA提供回复。其它关于CC内容的细节可以在文件中看到,但FDA明确指出请求者必须做足功课,并在OGD考虑回复之前提供与请求相关的详细而精确的信息。换句话说,过于宽泛的问题将不再会被受理,或放在CC项目或GDUFA目标下考虑。

制定了与非活性成分请求和Q1和Q2计算相关的具体建议。指南还列出了通常处理CC的各种学科。

FDA还概述了当接收到一份CC时,将如何回复请求者,以及回复将如何发布。无论他们认为该CC符合这项政策或不认为这是一份CC,OGD将与请求者交流。FDA还指出,他们:

“意识到在收到FDA对受控函的回复后,请求者可能有后续问题或相关的附加信息的请求。因为FDA工作人员不得不花费资源审核回复这些后续问题和附加信息的请求,FDA将把这类请求视为新的受控函。在这种情况下,我们建议请求者提交一份新的受控函,并在其中包含之前问询的受控函跟踪号码以便帮助FDA审核回复。”

这开启了一个与OGD交流的新时代。像ANDA状态,OGD已经表示他们不准备对未决CC请求提供状态更新。现在我们知道FDA对于CC中有什么内容,谁可以提交,如何提交以及FDA将如何回复的期望值。现在我们需要看到新的指南草案将如何应用于实践。以下是在项目第3-5队列年对于CC的指标和目标日期:

  • 2015财年FDA将自提交日期4个月内回复70%的受控函。
  • 2016财年FDA将自提交日期2个月内回复70%的受控函。
  • 2017财年FDA将自提交日期2个月内回复90%的受控函。
  • 如果受控函需要来临床部门的加入,将在以上目标的基础上增加1个月。

Lachman CONSULTANTS - Bob Pollock先生 2014-08-26
校译:识林-椒 2014-08-28

Controlled Correspondence Guidance for Generic Development Issues Today!
Written by Bob Pollock • August 26, 2014

As part of its GDUFA commitments the FDA has issued a Draft Guidance entitled Guidance for Industry – Controlled Correspondence Related to Generic Drug Development (here). FDA makes clear in this document that controlled correspondence (CC) does not include Citizen Petitions, petitions for reconsideration or stay requests.

The document provides detail and recommendations on:

  • what inquiries FDA considers as controlled correspondence for the purposes of meeting the Agency's GDUFA commitment;
  • what information requestors can include in a controlled correspondence to facilitate FDA's consideration of and response to a controlled correspondence; and
  • what information FDA will provide in its communications to requestors that have submitted controlled correspondence.

While there has never been an official Office of Generic Drug's (OGD) definition of a CC, for purposes of meeting the GDUFA goals OGD is defining a CC as:

A correspondence submitted to the Agency, by or on behalf of a generic drug manufacturer or related industry, requesting information on a specific element of generic drug product development.

OGD further clarifies that if an issue is raised in a CC that is also raised in a Citizen Petition that the goal date for a response to the CC will begin only after the FDA answers the specific petition that raises the similar issue.

There is also a "limbo" CC wherein the Agency may be considering a particular complex issue for which they have not yet reached a decision. According to the draft guidance OGD will inform the submitted of the CC that such is the case and will close out the CC at that time. OGD notes that such issues usually result in the development of a guidance to address the issue.

OGD has also defined some exceptions to the GDUFA goal dates on CCs. Historically requests for bioequivalence (BE) recommendations, BE protocols and requests for meetings have been treated as controlled correspondence but will no longer be treated as such as the development of responses to these issues can require considerable input from multiple disciplines or other offices in CDER. In addition there is a process in place for review of BE guidance which allows OGD to respond to the general public once a guidance recommendation is established. Responding to individual requests would place an undue burden on the program. There is also a program in place for the review of meeting request and BE protocol that wil continue to be followed outside of the CC process.

Other issues OGD considers outside of the CC definition include:

  • Questions regarding an ANDA status
  • Inquiries that are not related to drug development (e.g., questions on OGD administrative practices or development of aa drug not yet approved in the US)
  • General questions not related to the development of a specific product will not be assigned a GDUFA goal date.

In a big shift, OGD has defined the types of entities that it will consider eligible to submit CC under GDUFA goals which include only drug manufacturers and related industry. FDA says: “[I]nquiries related to generic drugs submitted by other parties (for example, private citizens, financial firms, or public advocacy groups that are not directly involved in developing generic drug products) should be directed to CDER's Division of Drug Information.”

The Guidance notes that CCs should be submitted electronically to GenericDrugs@fda.hhs.gov and the emails must be from a corporate email address as OGD will not consider CCs from general or personal accounts as a CC subject to GDUFA goals and will not address them.

Information on the content of a CC is provided and FDA notes that foreign entities must have a US Agent or representative identified and they must have a secure email address to which FDA will provide a response. Other details on CC content can be found in the document but the Agency makes clear that the requestor must have done its homework and provide detailed and concise information relative to the request before OGD will consider a response. In other words, no more overly broad questions will be entertained or considered under the CC program or GDUFA goals.

Specific recommendations are made relative to inactive ingredient level requests and, Q1 and Q2 determinations and the guidance also outlines the various disciplines to which CC would typically be addressed.

FDA also outlines how it will respond to the requestor when a CC is received, and how a response will be issued. OGD will communicate whether it believes the CC complies with this policy or whether OGD does not consider it a CC. FDA also notes that they:

“[r]ecognize that upon receipt of FDA's response to a controlled correspondence, requestors might have follow-up questions or requests for related, additional information. Because Agency staff will have to expend resources to review and respond to these follow-up questions and requests for additional information, FDA will treat the requests as new controlled correspondence. In these instances, we recommend that a requestor submit a new controlled correspondence and include the controlled correspondence tracking number(s) of the previous inquiry to facilitate FDA's review and response.”

This begins a new era of communications with OGD. Like ANDA status, OGD has indicated they don't plan on providing update on the status of pending CC requests. Well, now we know the FDA expectations as to what is in a CC, who may submit them, how to submit them and how FDA will respond. Now we need to see how the new Draft Guidance will work in practice. Below are the metrics and goal dates for CCs during cohort years 3-5 of the program:

  • FDA will respond to 70 percent of controlled correspondence in 4 months from date of submission in fiscal year (FY) 2015.
  • FDA will respond to 70 percent of controlled correspondence in 2 months from date of submission in FY 2016.
  • FDA will respond to 90 percent of controlled correspondence in 2 months from date of submission in FY 2017.
  • If the controlled correspondence requires input from the clinical division, one additional month will be added to the goals outlined above.

岗位必读建议:

  • 注册专员(注册):熟悉FDA对通用药品开发相关控制通信的指导,以便在提交申请时遵循正确的程序和格式。
  • 研发人员(研发):了解控制通信的定义和适用范围,确保在药品开发过程中及时获取FDA的反馈。
  • 质量管理(QA):掌握控制通信的提交和审查流程,保证企业提交的通信符合FDA要求。

文件适用范围:

本文适用于美国FDA对通用药品制造商及相关行业在药品开发过程中提交的控制通信的指导。涵盖化学药品的仿制药,由美国FDA发布,适用于Biotech、大型药企、跨国药企等。

文件要点总结:

  1. 控制通信定义:明确了控制通信是针对通用药品开发特定要素的信息请求,不包括公民请愿书等。

  2. 控制通信范围:详述了哪些问题属于控制通信范畴,包括悬而未决的公民请愿问题、仍在考虑中的问题等。

  3. 提交控制通信:提供了提交控制通信的方法、内容要求,以及特定类型控制通信的额外建议。

  4. 控制通信审查:解释了不同FDA部门如何审查控制通信,以及推荐合适的审查学科。

  5. FDA的通信:描述了FDA如何与提交控制通信的请求者进行沟通,包括确认接受、回应和目标日期。

以上仅为部分要点,请阅读原文,深入理解监管要求。

取自“https://login.shilinx.com/wiki/index.php?title=FDA%E5%8F%91%E5%B8%83%E4%BB%BF%E5%88%B6%E8%8D%AF%E7%A0%94%E5%8F%91%E5%8F%97%E6%8E%A7%E5%87%BD%E6%8C%87%E5%8D%97%E8%8D%89%E6%A1%88”
上一页: 仿制药生产商与国际标准组织开战
下一页: Para_IV_清单中的一些有趣现象
相关内容
相关新闻
  • FDA仿制药办公室GDUFA进展更新
  • GDUFA实施以来受控函数量持续...
  • FDA仿制药办公室GDUFA 进展更...
  • FDA回答了受控函草案的评论
  • FDA发布关于GDUFA自我认定及其...
热点新闻
  • ICH 发布新 Q1 稳定性指南...
  • 【直播】25年4月全球法规月报...
  • 【识林新文章】中国无菌附录对...
  • 【识林新工具】AI知识助手,AI...
  • VHP(过氧化氢蒸汽)的“脆弱...

 反馈意见

Copyright ©2011-2025 shilinx.com All Rights Reserved.
识林网站版权所有 京ICP备12018650号-2 (京)网药械信息备字(2022)第00078号
请登录APP查看
打开APP