替换
查找内容:
替换为:
全部替换
插入链接
链接网址:
链接显示标题:
请选择网址类型
点我插入链接
插入文件
文件名称:
文件显示标题:
请选择文件类型
点我插入文件
发现错误 发表观点

原文内容

反馈意见

提交 正在提交..... 反馈历史

复制下面的地址分享给好友

确定 正在提交.....
train

你好,

关闭
提交 重做 重新开始 关闭
跳转
  • 新建同级
  • 新建子级
  • 删除
  • 重命名
选择收藏夹
新建收藏夹
公开

取消 确定

1. 基本信息
姓名:
企业:
职位:
联系方式:
邮箱:
2. 请在此填写您的问题,我们将优先安排答疑
提交

报名成功!
课程观看链接如下:
请添加课程助理微信,获得更多信息:
确认
确定
取消 确认

识林

  • 知识
  • 视频
  • 社区
  • 政策法规
    • 国内药监
    • FDA
    • EU
    • PIC/S
    • WHO
    • ICH
    • MHRA
    • PMDA
    • TGA
  • 研发注册
    • 概览
    • 监管动态
    • 研究专题
  • 生产质量
    • 概览
    • 监管动态
    • 各国GMP
    • 中国GMP
    • 中国GMP指南
    • GMP对比
    • 检查缺陷
    • 研究专题
  • 主题词库
  • 帮助中心
  • 关于识林
    • 识林介绍
    • 识林FAQs
    • 功能介绍
    • 团队诊断
    • 联系我们
  • 30天免登录

    忘记密码?

新修订生物等效性指南阐明ANDA下BE要求

首页 > 资讯 > 新修订生物等效性指南阐明ANDA下BE要求

页面比对

出自识林

新修订生物等效性指南阐明ANDA下BE要求
ANDA
页面比对
笔记

2013-12-10 识林,FDA,Lachman CONSULTANTS

跳转到: 导航, 搜索

分析点评 — 中文翻译

预期的生物等效性和生物利用度指南(称为“总体考虑”指南)更新于近期发布。这份指南草案仅关注简化新药申请(仿制药)的生物等效性,并未关注用于诸如新药临床申请(INDs)或新药申请(NDAs)的生物利用度或生物等效性研究。 这份题为“以药动学为终点评价指标的仿制药生物等效性研究”的指南草案,可在CDER指南部分生物药剂学标题下检索到。该指南的简介部分指出,用于生物利用度和其它生物等效性研究的指南将很快发布。值得注意的是,因为仅仅强调针对ANDAs的更新,总体考虑指南、食物影响生物利用度和餐后生物等效性研究指南仍然在指南名录中。

新指南强调总体考虑指南和餐后生物等效性研究指南用于ANDAs研究方面。总体上,更新受到好评,并澄清了一系列问题,之前没有明确这些一直作为“惯例和习惯做法”存在的问题,在与仿制药办公室(OGD)交涉时,这些问题备受诟病。
这些关注点集中于制定新的、变更或是扩展指南的领域。指南重申了之前指南中的很多内容。这份指南草案以简介开头,并简要讨论了12个列出的本质上在生物等效性研究中具有普遍性的主题。附件着重于总体设计和数据处理。附件中没有重大变化。

第 III 章 生物等效性的建立 ( III. ESTABLISHING BIOEQUIVALENCE )

  • 餐后生物等效性研究 ( III. A. 10 Fed Bioequivalence Studies ):该部分澄清了针对速释药品的餐后生物等效性研究,除了橙皮书收录的参照药品标签说明的剂量与用法部分说明药品应空腹服用 ( 餐前1小时或餐后2小时 ) 的情况外,所有情况下均需开展餐后生物等效性研究。如果标签说明建议与食物一起服用药品,除了预期会发生严重的空腹服用不良事件的情况外,均要求开展空腹研究。
  • 在特定饮料中的生物等效性研究 ( III. A. 12 Bioequivalence Studies of Products Administered in Specific Beverages ):该部分声明,如果橙皮书收录的参照药品标签说明规定,药品必须与特定饮料服用,那么必须开展与标签说明中提及的饮料之中的一种混合服用的生物等效性研究。如果列有其它饮料,申请人应提供使用这些额外的饮料不会导致生物等效性差异的证据。

第 IV 章 不同剂型生物等效性的建立 ( IV. ESTABLISHING BIOEQUIVALENCE FOR DIFFERENT DOSAGE FORMS )

  • 在“不同剂型”章节下:指南论述了口服液、速释片和速释胶囊、悬浮液、缓释和延迟释放药品和咀嚼片。在这一涉及生物等效性豁免的部分,指南扩展讨论了剂量均衡(dose proportionality)、假剂量均衡(pseudo-dose proportionality)与其它情况(既非剂量均衡,也非假剂量均衡的情况)。 尽管有所扩展并以一定深度阐述,但仍然为“其它情况”的定义留出了空间。什么样的组成有资格获得生物等效性豁免一直在申请人中间引起很多焦虑,尽管新指南在一定程度上朝着给出明确答案的方向有所进步,但这些仍然是灰色地带。该部分还指出要求生物等效性研究的批准后变更的情况下,这些研究应为针对橙皮书收录的参照药品的变更后产品,而非针对变更前产品的研究。

第 V 章 特殊主题 ( V. SPECIAL TOPICS )

  • 母体药物与代谢物 ( V. A. 1 Parent Drug Versus Metabolites ):该部分属于第一个主题—待测基团,澄清了在所有情况下依赖母体药物来测定生物等效性,除了母体药物不能精确测量或含量水平过低不能充分鉴定的情况外。该部分还提供了何时测定代谢物的指南。只要母体药物能够充分测定,就可作为生物等效性测定基础,如果代谢物可以测定,可提供“治疗效果相当的支持性证据”。
  • 对映体与外消旋体 ( V. A. 2 Enantiomers Versus Racemates ) 和以复杂化合物作为活性成分的药品 ( V. A. 3 Drug Products with Complex Mixtures as the Active Ingredients ):这两部分指南没有变化。
  • 长半衰期药品 ( V. B. Long Half-Life Drugs ):该部分除了规定长半衰期为>24h外,无变化。
  • 第一点药峰浓度 ( V. C. First Point Cmax ):该部分原则上没有变化。
  • 酒精饮料对缓控释药品的作用 ( V. D. Alcoholic Beverage Effects On Modified Release Drug Products ):这是新增加的部分,建议申请人使用不同酒精混合物中的体外测试研发这些产品。某些情况下,可能需要体内生物等效性研究。具体的产品指南,参见各个产品生物等效性建议。
  • 内源性化合物 ( V. E. Endogenous Compounds ):这是另一个新增部分,指导如何设计和开展针对内源性化合物的生物等效性研究。
  • 预期用于局部作用的口服药品 ( V. F. Orally Administered Drugs Intended For Local Action )和体外溶出度检测( V. G. In Vitro Dissolution Testing ):与之前的指南相比,这两部分没有根本性改变。

总体上,这是一份有用的指南,澄清了很多之前的灰色地带,使得申请人开展支持仿制药申请的生物等效性研究更为容易。

北京大学药物信息与工程研究中心 - Garth Boehm 博士 2013-12-11
翻译:识林-Kapok 2013-12-11

分析点评 — 英文原文

The promised update to the guidance on Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Studies (the so-called “General Considerations” guidance) has published. This draft guidance addresses only bioequivalence studies for ANDAs and so does not address bioavailablity studies or bioequivalence studies for any other purpose such as INDs or NDAs.
The draft guidance is titled “Bioequivalence Studies with Pharmacokinetic Endpoints for Drugs Submitted Under an ANDA” and can be found in the CDER Guidances section under the “Biopharmaceutics” heading. The introduction states that guidance for bioavailability studies and for other bioequivalence studies will be published “soon”. Note that because this only addresses updates for ANDAs, the General Considerations guidance and the Food-Effect Bioavailability and Fed Bioequivalence Studies guidance remain in the guidance list.
The new guidance addresses aspects of the General Considerations guidance and the Fed Studies guidance as they apply to bioequivalence studies for ANDAs. In general the update is good and clarifies a number of issues that had not been previously defined but had existed in the realm of “usual and customary practice” which is always an uncomfortable space when dealing with OGD.
These notes concentrate on areas where new, changed, or expanded guidance is provided. There are many sections where previous guidance is reiterated in this guidance.
The guidance begins with an Introduction and briefly discussed 12 listed topics that are general in nature to bioequivalence studies. There is an attachment which addresses General Design and Data Handling. There are no significant changes in this attachment.

  • Fed Bioequivalence Studies – This section clarifies that for immediate-release products fed studies are required in all cases except when the dosage and administration section of the RLD labeling states that the product should be taken on an empty stomach (that is 1 hour before or 2 hours after a meal). When the label recommends taking the product with food, fasting studies are required except when serious adverse events are expected with fasting administration.
  • Bioequivalence Studies of Products Administered in Specific Beverages – This section states that if the labeling of the RLD specifies that the product must be administered in a specific beverage(s), then BE studies for these products should be administered mixed with one of the beverages mentioned in the labeling. If additional beverages are listed then sponsors should provide evidence that using these additional beverages would not result in BE differences.
  • Under the heading “Different Dosage Forms” the guidance deals with Oral Solutions, IR Tablets and Capsules, Suspensions, Delayed-release and Extended-release Products, and Chewable Tablets. In this section regarding biowaivers, the guidance presents an expanded discussion of dose proportionality, pseudo-dose proportionality, and other situations (that is neither dose proportional nor pseudo-dose proportional). Although this is expanded and presented in some depth, it still leaves open the “other situations” definition. This issue of what compositions are eligible for biowaivers has caused much anxiety among sponsors and although the new guidance goes some way towards a definitive answer, there are still gray areas.This section also states that where post approval changes that require bioequivalence studies are made, that these studies should be post change product against RLD and not against pre change product.

The next section is titled “Special Topics”. The first special topic is moieties to be measured.

  • Parent Drug Versus Metabolites – This section clarifies the reliance on parent drug to determine bioequivalence in all circumstances except where the parent drug cannot be accurately measured or the levels are too low to allow adequate characterization. It also provides guidance on when to measure metabolites. Wherever parent drug can be adequately characterized, it is serves as the basis of bioequivalence determination, metabolites, if measured, providing “supportive evidence of a comparable therapeutic outcome”.
  • Guidance on Enantiomers Versus Racemates and Drug Products with Complex Mixtures as the Active Ingredients is unchanged.
  • Long Half-Life Drugs – Unchanged except that a long half-life is given as >24 hours.
  • The section on First Point Cmax is essentially unchanged but for a little elaboration on the concern in these cases.
  • Alcoholic Beverage Effects On Modified Release Drug Products – This is a new section suggesting that sponsors develop these products using in vitro testing in various alcohol mixtures. In some instances an in vivo BE study may be required. For specific product guidance see the Individual Product Bioequivalence Recommendations.
  • Endogenous Compounds – This is another new section which gives guidance on how design and conduct BE studies for endogenous compounds.
  • Sections on Orally Administered Drugs Intended For Local Action and In Vitro Dissolution Testing are essentially unchanged from previous guidance.

Overall this is a helpful guidance which cleans up many previously gray areas and should make the conduct of bioequivalence studies to support ANDAs easier for sponsors.
北京大学药物信息与工程研究中心 Garth Boehm 博士 2013-12-11

Lachman CONSULTANTS的博客文章

New Revised Bioequivalence Guidance Clarifies Requirements
Written by Bob Pollock • December 09, 2013

FDA issued a newly revised Draft Guidance entitled Bioequivalence Studies with Pharmacokinetic Endpoints for Drug Submitted Under an ANDA (here). The new Guidance document is specific to abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs) and combines part of two previous guidance documents on general bioequivalence (BE) and BE for fed studies for ANDAs. The document does not address bioavailability (BA) or BE for investigational new drug applications (INDs) or for studies required to support BE for new drug applications (NDAs).

This document deals with both BE and in vitro requirements for approval and post-approval changes to ANDAs and addresses many topics, including, but not limited to:

  • when fed studies are necessary
  • specific BE requirements for immediate-release products, suspensions, solutions and modified-release and extended release dosage forms
  • sprinkle study requirements
  • when BE waivers are appropriate
  • Special topics covered include:

Moieties to be measured in the various studies

  • Fed studies
  • Alcohol studies
  • The issue of racemates and also how to handle evaluation of drugs containing endogenous compounds
  • Drugs with a Long half-life
  • First point Cmax and importance of Tmax
  • Partial AUCs
  • Orally administered drugs intended for local action
  • Narrow therapeutic range drugs
  • Parallel and replicate design studies

The Guidance also clarifies with certainty when and what products must be tested in vivo or in vitro when considering original ANDA approval or when making a post-approval change,which is an issue that has never really been spelled out before with as much clarity as in this document. There are also specific instruction on how to handle the BE testing of chewable tablets. There is also a section that deals with complex mixtures as the active ingredients that sheds some light on Office of Generic Drugs (OGD) expectations.

This ANDA-specific Guidance provides in one place information that has been scattered in various documents and some new direction for ANDA applicants in a manner that is straightforward and leaves no doubt as to OGD's intention.

取自“https://login.shilinx.com/wiki/index.php?title=%E6%96%B0%E4%BF%AE%E8%AE%A2%E7%94%9F%E7%89%A9%E7%AD%89%E6%95%88%E6%80%A7%E6%8C%87%E5%8D%97%E9%98%90%E6%98%8EANDA%E4%B8%8BBE%E8%A6%81%E6%B1%82”
上一页: FDA发布指南草案关注仿制药产品物理等效
下一页: 业界对委托生产审批管理规定的反馈意见
相关内容
相关新闻
  • FDA发布非达霉素片剂BE指南并...
  • FDA否定请愿并修订鲁比前列酮B...
  • BE 做到一半,FDA 又修订了...
  • FDA发布又一波BE指南修订 -...
  • FDA发布38份新BE指南和6份修订...
热点新闻
  • ICH 发布新 Q1 稳定性指南...
  • 【直播】25年4月全球法规月报...
  • 【识林新文章】中国无菌附录对...
  • 【识林新工具】AI知识助手,AI...
  • VHP(过氧化氢蒸汽)的“脆弱...

 反馈意见

Copyright ©2011-2025 shilinx.com All Rights Reserved.
识林网站版权所有 京ICP备12018650号-2 (京)网药械信息备字(2022)第00078号
请登录APP查看
打开APP