替换
查找内容:
替换为:
全部替换
插入链接
链接网址:
链接显示标题:
请选择网址类型
点我插入链接
插入文件
文件名称:
文件显示标题:
请选择文件类型
点我插入文件
发现错误 发表观点

原文内容

反馈意见

提交 正在提交..... 反馈历史

复制下面的地址分享给好友

确定 正在提交.....
train

你好,

关闭
提交 重做 重新开始 关闭
跳转
  • 新建同级
  • 新建子级
  • 删除
  • 重命名
选择收藏夹
新建收藏夹
公开

取消 确定

1. 基本信息
姓名:
企业:
职位:
联系方式:
邮箱:
2. 请在此填写您的问题,我们将优先安排答疑
提交

报名成功!
课程观看链接如下:
请添加课程助理微信,获得更多信息:
确认
确定
取消 确认

识林

  • 知识
  • 视频
  • 社区
  • 政策法规
    • 国内药监
    • FDA
    • EU
    • PIC/S
    • WHO
    • ICH
    • MHRA
    • PMDA
    • TGA
  • 研发注册
    • 概览
    • 监管动态
    • 研究专题
  • 生产质量
    • 概览
    • 监管动态
    • 各国GMP
    • 中国GMP
    • 中国GMP指南
    • GMP对比
    • 检查缺陷
    • 研究专题
  • 主题词库
  • 帮助中心
  • 关于识林
    • 识林介绍
    • 识林FAQs
    • 功能介绍
    • 团队诊断
    • 联系我们
  • 30天免登录

    忘记密码?

2014财年和2015财年FDA首仿批准量

首页 > 资讯 > 2014财年和2015财年FDA首仿批准量

页面比对

出自识林

2014财年和2015财年FDA首仿批准量
研发注册
页面比对
笔记

2016-05-19 Lachman CONSULTANTS

跳转到: 导航, 搜索

2013财年,仿制药办公室(OGD)报告批准了108个首仿产品。这一信息来自OGD的仿制药批准报告(url)2013年首仿清单(url)。因为自我们观察首仿批准和OGD现在已经开始加快对首仿产品的审评(在某些情况下)已有一段时间,我想我们应该再来看看2014财年和2015财年以及2016财年前7个月的数字。

下表列出了各时期FDA报告的首仿药批准。

财年 首仿批准量 ANDA接收量
2013 108 968
2014 108 1473
2015 71 539
2016* 55* 527*

* - 2016财年截至2016年4月

虽然这些数字很有意思,但我不能肯定除了FDA自己所说的之外我们能说多少。因为2015年仅有71件首次获批,我们应该得出OGD放缓的结论吗?一点都不能。显然有一些因素在OGD的控制之外,例如专利和专营权保护,包括5年NCE专营权、3年Hatch-Waxman专营权和180天仿制药专营权,更不用说儿科专营权延长和专利延期。此外,首次获得仿制药批准资格的产品数量的变更和大量其它问题,像申请质量、产品或API的复杂性,也影响OGD将首仿药推向市场的能力。然而,这张表显示了OGD专注于尽可能快的将首仿药推向市场。

未来,如果ANDA批准流程具有足够快的速度,GDUFA目标日期达到10个月,我们也许能够更多的对比ANDA接收量和首仿药批准的百分比。但,即使这样,试图仅根据这两个指标做出假设很有可能会被证明是目光短浅的,因为无法从有效的数据中搜集完整的故事。希望首仿药获批数量与批准限制一致,并反映OGD的努力以保证,如果一件ANDA可以作为首仿批准,它会在可以被合法批准的首日获得批准。

Lachman CONSULTANTS - Bob Pollock先生
编译:识林-椒
识林®www.shilinx.com版权所有,未经许可不得转载。如需使用请联系admin@shilinx.com

First-Time Generic Approvals in FY 2014 and 2015
By Bob Pollock | May 18, 2016

In December 2014, we did a story on First-Time generic approvals for FY 2013 (here). In that post we noted that, for FY 2013, the Office of Generic Drugs (OGD) reported approving 108 first time generic products. This information was taken from OGD's Generic Approval reports (here) and navigating to 2013's First-Time list (here). Because it has been a while since we looked at First-Time generic approvals, and since OGD has now begun to expedite the review of First-Time generic products (in certain circumstances), we thought we would take another look at the numbers for FY 2014 and 2015 and the first 7 months of FY 2016.

The table below outlines FDA’s reports of first generic approvals for the respective time periods.

FY No. Of First Generic Approvals ANDAs Received during the FY
2013 108 968
2014 108 1473
2015 71 539
2016* 55* 527*

*- FY 2016 through April 2016

While these numbers are interesting, I am not certain how much we can say about them other than they speak for themselves. Should we conclude that, because in 2015 only 71 first time approvals were made, OGD had a slow down? No, not at all. There are obviously a number of factors outside of OGD's control, such as patent and exclusivity protection, including 5-year NCE exclusivity, 3-year Hatch-Waxman exclusivity and 180-day generic exclusivity, not to mention pediatric exclusivity extensions and patent delays. In addition, the changing number of products that may be first time eligible for generic approval and a host of other issues like application quality, the complexity of the product or the API also impact OGD's ability to get First-Time generics to market. However, this chart does demonstrate that OGD does focus on brining First-Time generic drugs to market as fast as they can.

In the future, if the ANDA approval process picks up enough speed and as the GDUFA goal dates hit 10 months (as they will in FY 2017), we may be able to make more of a comparison of the number of ANDA receipts and vs the % of First-Time generic approvals. But, even then, trying to make assumptions based on just those two metrics may prove to be shortsighted as the full story cannot be gleaned from that limited data. The hope would be that the numbers of first generic approvals will be consistent with the limitations for approval and reflect an effort by OGD to assure that, if an ANDA can be approved as a first generic, it is approved at the first date that it can be legally approved.

取自“https://login.shilinx.com/wiki/index.php?title=2014%E8%B4%A2%E5%B9%B4%E5%92%8C2015%E8%B4%A2%E5%B9%B4FDA%E9%A6%96%E4%BB%BF%E6%89%B9%E5%87%86%E9%87%8F”
上一页: 削弱FDA监管换取更多医疗研究经费?
下一页: FDA表示处方产前维生素和糖尿病食品不属于医疗食品
相关内容
相关新闻
  • ANDA申请时需优先考虑的两个问...
  • OGD 2018年批准多个首仿药,...
  • 复杂仿制药研发的胜利 — 首...
  • 2016财年FDA首仿批准量
  • 2015正在成为首仿药的丰收年
热点新闻
  • ICH 发布新 Q1 稳定性指南...
  • 【直播】25年4月全球法规月报...
  • 【识林新文章】中国无菌附录对...
  • 【识林新工具】AI知识助手,AI...
  • VHP(过氧化氢蒸汽)的“脆弱...

 反馈意见

Copyright ©2011-2025 shilinx.com All Rights Reserved.
识林网站版权所有 京ICP备12018650号-2 (京)网药械信息备字(2022)第00078号
请登录APP查看
打开APP