替换
查找内容:
替换为:
全部替换
插入链接
链接网址:
链接显示标题:
请选择网址类型
点我插入链接
插入文件
文件名称:
文件显示标题:
请选择文件类型
点我插入文件
发现错误 发表观点

原文内容

反馈意见

提交 正在提交..... 反馈历史

复制下面的地址分享给好友

确定 正在提交.....
train

你好,

关闭
提交 重做 重新开始 关闭
跳转
  • 新建同级
  • 新建子级
  • 删除
  • 重命名
选择收藏夹
新建收藏夹
公开

取消 确定

1. 基本信息
姓名:
企业:
职位:
联系方式:
邮箱:
2. 请在此填写您的问题,我们将优先安排答疑
提交

报名成功!
课程观看链接如下:
请添加课程助理微信,获得更多信息:
确认
确定
取消 确认

识林

  • 知识
  • 视频
  • 社区
  • 政策法规
    • 国内药监
    • FDA
    • EU
    • PIC/S
    • WHO
    • ICH
    • MHRA
    • PMDA
    • TGA
  • 研发注册
    • 概览
    • 监管动态
    • 研究专题
  • 生产质量
    • 概览
    • 监管动态
    • 各国GMP
    • 中国GMP
    • 中国GMP指南
    • GMP对比
    • 检查缺陷
    • 研究专题
  • 主题词库
  • 帮助中心
  • 关于识林
    • 识林介绍
    • 识林FAQs
    • 功能介绍
    • 团队诊断
    • 联系我们
  • 30天免登录

    忘记密码?

GDUFA II期谈判和FDA行动趋势

首页 > 资讯 > GDUFA II期谈判和FDA行动趋势

页面比对

出自识林

GDUFA II期谈判和FDA行动趋势
ANDA Approval
页面比对
笔记

2016-02-23 Lachman CONSULTANTS

跳转到: 导航, 搜索

GDUFA II期谈判正在紧锣密鼓的进行。与小企业相关的付费问题是正在讨论的话题之一,尤其是设施费问题是否仅应该在ANDA批准后收取。这也是国会关注的问题,并将在谈判讨论中获得显著关注。公开地谈判会议纪要还解决了像申请审评的GDUFA目标日期、补充申请时间和来自企业回复的增补审评时间。我们将会看到双方(FDA和企业)最终达成一致。

在谈判期间关于FDA审评和批准行动的一些有趣的趋势如下:

批准在上升吗?
我们在GDUFA I期第四年开始后看到了几个月批准量的上升。然而,一月和二月(本月到18日为止在FDA月度批准列表上显示仅批准24件ANDA)的批准量已经与在本财年最初几个月相比有些后退。随着Uhl博士周三在GPhA年会上做报告,我们将看到是否有一些ANDA获得通过。FDA指出,本年度批准量应会上升,事实是我不认为这会存在争议,但会上升多少呢?

信息请求(IR)和易更正缺陷(ECD)大幅增长
信息请求(IR)和易更正缺陷(ECD)的交流可以清楚的检测企业的回复能力。随着700多封信函飞入企业中,FDA显然达到了其将整个GDUFA审评时钟运转起来的目标,从而企业和FDA可以改善其首轮批准。我认为跟据记录GDUFA第三年仅有一件首轮批准,有趣的是看到这些IR和ECD在接下来的一到两年中将如何影响首轮批准。

12月ANDA接收量上涨
随着2015年12月原始ANDA接收量达到180件,我敢肯定OGD正变得紧张。今年的ANDA接收量会超过1000件吗?或许不会,但很可能会超过上个财年539件的总接收量。 接收量直接影响了FDA可以花费多少审评时间在“旧积压”申请和GDUFA前两年没有GDUFA目标日期但有初步行动日期(TAD)的提交上。

补充申请怎么回事?
2016财年最初的几个月我们没有看到在之前已获批申请的补充申请(PAS)或待批变更(CBE)补充申请方面的太大变化。每月仍存在大约40件PAS补充和450件CBE-30补充申请提交(尽管2015年10月有超过600件CBE-30,而接下来的两个月每月约有370件)。我们需要关注补充申请的趋势。难道FDA没有谈到减少通过补充申请报告一些变更的要求吗?然而,到现在为止我们还没有看到太多缓解。

GDUFA完全回应后会议请求
令人惊讶的是很少有完全回应后会议请求,至少在GDUFA第4年的最初3个月期间仅有6个请求。我猜企业正更好地理解他们得到的完全回应函中的问题,或许是因为他们需要在ANDA审评的IR和ECD阶段提出问题。

检查
很多讨论围绕检查行动和ANDA批准。基于风险的检查问题继续被讨论(我们已经在1984年讨论过这一问题),而且现在处于讨论的舞台中心。由于FDA高级官员表示ANDA批准将不会因检查而被暂停,企业希望看到如何实际操作。

Lachman CONSULTANTS - Bob Pollock先生
编译:识林-椒
识林®www.shilinx.com版权所有,未经许可不得转载。如需使用请联系admin@shilinx.com

GDUFA II Negotiations and FDA Trends
By Bob Pollock | February 22, 2016

GDUFA II Negotiations and FDA Trends

We all know that the GDUFA II negotiations are in full swing. Among topics being discussed are fee issues associated with small businesses and especially the subject of establishment fees and whether they should be collected only after ANDA approval. This is also on the radar of Congress and will likely get some significant attention in the negotiation discussions.

Publically, the minutes of meetings also address areas like negotiations of GDUFA goal dates for application review, supplement review times, and amendment review times for responses from firms. There are a lot of moving parts, and we will need to see where both parties (FDA and industry) ultimately rest.

Some interesting trends that we have seen during the negotiations relative to FDA review and approval activities are as follows:

Approvals on the rise – or are they?

We saw a few good months with approval up sharply after the beginning of the start of year four of GDUFA I. However, January and February (so far this month up to the 18th only 24 ANDAs are listed as approved on the FDA monthly approvals list) have been somewhat a step back from the numbers we have seen in the first few months of this FY. With Dr. Uhl’s presence at the GPhA annual meeting on Wednesday, we will have to see if some ANDAs get pushed through. FDA has noted that approvals should be up this year, a fact that I don’t believe will be disputed, but how much.

IRs and ECDs Rise dramatically

The communication of information requests (IRs) and easily correctible deficiencies (ECDs) are clearly testing industry’s ability to respond. With numbers of letters in the 700s flying out to industry, FDA is clearly approaching its goal of getting the ball rolling throughout the GDUFA review clock, so that firms and the Agency can improve their firstcycle approvals. With one (I believe) first cycle approval under GDUFA year three on the books, it will be interesting to see how these IR and ECDs impact on first cycle approvals over the next year or two.

ANDA receipts popped up in December

With the number of original ANDA receipts hitting 180 in December 2015, I am certain that OGD was getting nervous. Could this be another 1000 ANDA receipt year? Maybe not, but it will likely beat last FY’s total of 539. The impact of receipts are a driving factor in regard to how much review time FDA can spend on the “old backlog” applications and years 1 and 2 GDUFA submissions that don’t have GDUFA goal dates, but instead, have Tentative Action Dates (TADS).

Supplements – what’s up with them?

We don’t see much change in PAS or CBE supplements over the first few months of FY 2016. There are still about 40 PAS supplements a month and about 450 CBE-30 submissions a month (albeit October 2015 saw well over 600 CBE-30s and the following two months saw in about 370 per month). We will need to watch the supplemental trends. Didn’t FDA talk about reducing the requirements for reporting some changes via supplements? Well, we have not seen much relief there, to date.

GDUFA post CR meeting requests

There have been, surprisingly, few post-completed response meeting requests, at least during the first three months of GDUFA year four with only 6 requests. I guess firms are better understanding the questions they are getting in the CRs – maybe that is because they need to raise the issues during the IR and ECD phases of the ANDA review.

Inspections

Much discussion is revolving around inspectional activity and ANDA approval. The issue of risk-based inspection continues to be discussed (we were discussing this in 1984), but now it sits center stage. With top FDA officials saying ANDA approval will not be held up because of inspections, the industry would like to see how that is going to play out in real life.

So, that is how I am seeing things so far this year. If you have any other observations, please write me at r.pollock@lachmanconsultants.com. I look forward to hearing from you.

取自“https://login.shilinx.com/wiki/index.php?title=GDUFA_II%E6%9C%9F%E8%B0%88%E5%88%A4%E5%92%8CFDA%E8%A1%8C%E5%8A%A8%E8%B6%8B%E5%8A%BF”
上一页: 参议院确认Califf为新任FDA局长
下一页: 北京大学连续制造研讨会-第三轮通知
相关内容
相关新闻
  • FDA9月仿制药批准数据 – OG...
  • GDUFA II期谈判完成,关键条...
  • FDA仿制药办公室新进展及重要...
  • FDA仿制药办公室的“甜甜圈空...
  • FDA仿制药审评积压迎来转机
热点新闻
  • ICH 发布新 Q1 稳定性指南...
  • 【直播】25年4月全球法规月报...
  • 【识林新工具】AI知识助手,AI...
  • 【识林新文章】中国无菌附录对...
  • VHP(过氧化氢蒸汽)的“脆弱...

 反馈意见

Copyright ©2011-2025 shilinx.com All Rights Reserved.
识林网站版权所有 京ICP备12018650号-2 (京)网药械信息备字(2022)第00078号
请登录APP查看
打开APP