替换
查找内容:
替换为:
全部替换
插入链接
链接网址:
链接显示标题:
请选择网址类型
点我插入链接
插入文件
文件名称:
文件显示标题:
请选择文件类型
点我插入文件
发现错误 发表观点

原文内容

反馈意见

提交 正在提交..... 反馈历史

复制下面的地址分享给好友

确定 正在提交.....
train

你好,

关闭
提交 重做 重新开始 关闭
跳转
  • 新建同级
  • 新建子级
  • 删除
  • 重命名
选择收藏夹
新建收藏夹
公开

取消 确定

1. 基本信息
姓名:
企业:
职位:
联系方式:
邮箱:
2. 请在此填写您的问题,我们将优先安排答疑
提交

报名成功!
课程观看链接如下:
请添加课程助理微信,获得更多信息:
确认
确定
取消 确认

识林

  • 知识
  • 视频
  • 社区
  • 政策法规
    • 国内药监
    • FDA
    • EU
    • PIC/S
    • WHO
    • ICH
    • MHRA
    • PMDA
    • TGA
  • 研发注册
    • 概览
    • 监管动态
    • 研究专题
  • 生产质量
    • 概览
    • 监管动态
    • 各国GMP
    • 中国GMP
    • 中国GMP指南
    • GMP对比
    • 检查缺陷
    • 研究专题
  • 主题词库
  • 帮助中心
  • 关于识林
    • 识林介绍
    • 识林FAQs
    • 功能介绍
    • 团队诊断
    • 联系我们
  • 30天免登录

    忘记密码?

对FDA质量量度指南草案(2016版)的反馈意见

首页 > 资讯 > 对FDA质量量度指南草案(2016版)的反馈意见

页面比对

出自识林

对FDA质量量度指南草案(2016版)的反馈意见
反馈意见
页面比对
笔记

2017-01-24

跳转到: 导航, 搜索

2016年11月25日,FDA发布了质量量度指南草案的第1版修订稿(称“2016版指南”),与2015版有较大变化。北京大学药物信息与工程研究中心翻译了该指南,并向国内业界收集反馈意见。征求意见原截止于2017年1月24日,中心现已向FDA正式提交反馈意见,中英对照稿详见下文。

考虑到FDA将征求意见截止日期延迟到2017年3月27日(美国东部时间),截止日期前,仍可通过电子或纸质的方式直接向FDA提交反馈,也可3月17日前发送邮件(不限中英文)至qmguidance@cpier.pku.edu.cn,通过北大药物信息与工程研究中心汇总、翻译、整理后,再次反馈至FDA。我们鼓励国内企业积极参与意见反馈,提早参与到监管机构政策制定的过程中来。

中心向FDA提交反馈意见的中英对照稿如下:

Line 222–223, “PQCR = the number of product quality complaints received for the product divided by the total number of dosage units distributed in the current reporting timeframe.”
222–223行,“产品质量投诉率(PQCR)=报告期内,产品收到的质量投诉数,除以同一报告期内放行的剂量单位总数。”

Comment:
1. If the product Z is not produced in the current reporting timeframe but complaints are received for the batches produced in the previous reporting timeframe, shall the complaints be counted in the current timeframe or be updated in the previous? If counted in the current timeframe, the PQCR will have zero as denominator.
2. For API products, the complaints are potentially more often on a whole batch than a portion of a batch. Thus, for manufacturers producing the same API product with a same number of batches per year, the manufacturer with a larger batch size may naturally have a lower PQCR, since the numerator is identical while a larger batch size means a larger denominator. For example, for the same API product, manufacturer X produces 10 batches a year with a batch size of 10kg, and manufacturer Y produces 10 batches a year with a batch size of 100kg. Both of the manufacturers receive one compliant on one batch. The PQCR of manufacturer X will be 10 times of that of Y.

反馈:
1. 若产品Z在当前报告期没有生产,但收到上个报告期产品批次的投诉,应该将该投诉计入当前报告期还是更新上个报告期的数据?若将投诉计入当前报告期,PQCR将无法计算,因为有一个等于零的分母。
2. 对于API而言,投诉可能更经常针对整个批次,而非整批的一部分。这样一来,对于生产同一API产品、每年生产相同批数的厂家而言,批量更大的厂家天然有更低的PQCR,因为在分子相同的情况下,更大的批量意味着更大的分母。例如,对于同一API产品,X厂每年生产10批,每批10kg,Y厂每年生产10批,每批100kg。若两厂报告期内均有1批收到1个质量投诉,则X厂的PQCR将是Y厂的10倍。


Line 226–229, “IOOSR = the number of OOS test results for lot release and long-term stability testing invalidated by the covered establishment due to an aberration of the measurement process divided by the total number of lot release and long-term stability OOS test results in the current reporting timeframe.”
226–229行,“无效OOS率(IOOSR)=报告期内,批次放行检验和长期稳定性检验的OOS结果中,因检验过程中的过失而被涵盖设施判定无效的OOS个数,除以同一报告期内批次放行和长期稳定性检验的全部OOS个数。”

Comment:
1. If the investigation shows the OOS is caused by QA/QC sampling aberration instead of QC testing, should the OOS be counted as an invalidated OOS test result?
2. If the OOS investigation fails in finding the root cause, and the batch is finally released based on statistically sound retesting and totality of evidence, should the OOS result be counted and should it be counted as an invalidated OOS test results?

反馈:
1. 若调查发现该OOS是因QA或QC取样错误导致,而非QC检验的差错,此时,该OOS是否应当记为无效的OOS检验结果?
2. 若OOS调查未能确认根本原因,但整批产品通过有统计学意义的复测和综合评估,最终做出放行决定,此时,该OOS结果是否应该被计入?是否应当计入无效的OOS检验结果?


Line 320, “Specific criteria for the IOOSR data”
320行,“无效OOS率(IOOSR)数据具体标准”

Comment:
If five samples from five lots for five lot release tests are prepared in a row, and the sample preparation was incorrect for all the samples, thus resulting in five OOS test results, should it be counted as five OOS test results and five invalidated OOS test results, or one OOS test results and one invalidated OOS test results, considering the five mistakes made are actually sharing the same root cause.

反馈:
若5个批次的放行检验的5个样本在同一时间段内依次制备,但样本制备均出了差错,得到5个OOS结果,考虑到5个OOS结果实际上均出自同一错误,此时应当记为5个OOS检验结果和5个无效OOS检验结果,还是记为1个OOS检验结果和1个无效的OOS检验结果更合适?


Line 644–646, “Product Quality Complaint – a complaint involving any possible, including actual, failure of a drug to meet any of its specifications designed to ensure that any drug conforms to appropriate standards of identity strength, quality, and purity.”
644–646行,“产品质量投诉——涉及药品任何可能的,包括事实上未能符合其质量标准的投诉。质量标准的设计确保了任何药品符合恰当的鉴别、规格、质量和纯度。”

Comment:
1. If the API or intermediate manufacturer receives a quality complaint from the finished product manufacturer, and the investigation eventually shows the issue actually caused by the latter. Should the complaint still be counted as a product quality compliant on the API or intermediate manufacturer?
2. If the API or intermediate manufacturer produces products with the same process and standards, and delivers the products to five finished product manufacturer clients. The API manufacturer receives one quality complaint from one of its five clients, indicating the product does not meet its in-house purchasing standards, which is much tighter than the USP as well as that of the other four clients. Should this complaint be counted as a quality compliant that involves possible or actual failure of the drug to meet its specifications designed to ensure that the drug conforms to appropriate standards of identity strength, quality, and purity?

反馈:
1. 若API或中间体厂商收到下游制剂厂商的质量投诉,但调查最终显示,问题是下游制剂厂商造成的。此时,该质量投诉还应当记在API或中间体厂商吗?
2. 若API或中间体厂商用相同工艺和相同标准生产产品,卖给5个不同的制剂厂商,收到其中1个厂商的质量投诉,称产品未满足其某一采购标准,而该采购标准比USP和其它4个厂商的标准都要严格很多。这样的投诉是否也应当记为质量投诉?因为产品质量投诉的定义是“可能的,包括事实上未能符合其质量标准的投诉。质量标准的设计确保了任何药品符合恰当的鉴别、规格、质量和纯度。”


Line 673, “Appendix A.1: Applicable Inputs for a Product Report Submission, Application Product, Finished Drug Product”
673行,“附录 A.1: 提交产品报告,申报产品,成品药品填写适用”

Comment:
1. For product reporting establishments owning and manufacturing the product, none of the four rows in the table seems applicable. Consider to add a new row for this circumstance.
2. Please provide examples and demonstrations for the Appendix A tables.

反馈:
1. 对于同时满足产品所有者和生产者的产品报告设施而言,表格中的4行似乎都不适用。考虑对此情况新增一行。
2. 请提供附录A表格的填写示例。


Line 718, “APPENDIX B: EXAMPLES”
718行,“附录B:示例”

Comment:
1. Please provide examples in the context of API and intermediate manufacturing, especially for Lot Acceptance Rate and Product Quality Complaint Rate.
2. Specifically, for the Lot Acceptance Rate, how to define packaging product lots for API and intermediate?

反馈:
1. 请提供适用于API和中间体生产的示例,特别对于批次接受率和产品质量投诉率量度。
2. 特别地,对API和中间体应当如何定义批次接受率量度中的包装产品批次数?

获取FDA质量量度指南草案的修订稿《提交质量量度数据》中文翻译,请点击“阅读原文”,完整填写信息和参与问卷调查后,资料将发送到邮箱。请务必确保邮箱准确可用,若2天内收不到邮件,很可能是邮箱填写错误,或服务器不接受,请留言联系管理员更新邮箱信息。

来源:北京大学药物信息与工程研究中心

识林®www.shilinx.com版权所有,未经许可不得转载。如需使用请联系admin@shilinx.com

取自“https://login.shilinx.com/wiki/index.php?title=%E5%AF%B9FDA%E8%B4%A8%E9%87%8F%E9%87%8F%E5%BA%A6%E6%8C%87%E5%8D%97%E8%8D%89%E6%A1%88%EF%BC%882016%E7%89%88%EF%BC%89%E7%9A%84%E5%8F%8D%E9%A6%88%E6%84%8F%E8%A7%81”
上一页: FDA国外药品检查有所改善但仍需提高
下一页: 美最高法院受理生物类似药上市通知和专利之舞之争
相关内容
相关新闻
  • 对FDA质量量度指南草案的反馈...
  • FDA 2016版质量量度指南要求...
  • 余煊强访谈:FDA药品质量办公...
  • 美国ISPE质量量度峰会简报
  • 谈FDA改变药品质量监管文化(...
热点新闻
  • ICH 发布新 Q1 稳定性指南...
  • 【直播】25年4月全球法规月报...
  • 【识林新工具】AI知识助手,AI...
  • 【识林新文章】中国无菌附录对...
  • VHP(过氧化氢蒸汽)的“脆弱...

 反馈意见

Copyright ©2011-2025 shilinx.com All Rights Reserved.
识林网站版权所有 京ICP备12018650号-2 (京)网药械信息备字(2022)第00078号
请登录APP查看
打开APP